harold trip duperier iii

San Antonio Report

Nonprofit journalism for an informed community

Water company’s moves anger buyers, landowners, local governments

Share this:

• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

In 2018, Ronnie Urbanczyk signed a contract to purchase water from Texas Water Supply Co., a Boerne company with access to at least 40 water wells that tap into the drought-sensitive Trinity Aquifer just south of the Bexar County line.

Three years later, Urbanczyk doesn’t want the water anymore, but that won’t stop Texas Water Supply from holding him to the water contract. The impasse could put an end to plans to turn Urbanczyk’s land into a state park .

The conflict is just the latest for Texas Water Supply, whose business tactics have led to complaints from its biggest customer, the San Antonio Water System, over how the company operates its wells. Groundwater experts have also expressed concern about how the company’s planned pumping will affect people who depend on the Trinity Aquifer for home use. Landowners along the company’s planned pipeline route have also faced threats of eminent domain from the company.

Unlike newer wells that supply water to small-lot landowners and housing developments north of San Antonio, Texas Water Supply’s wells come with no limits on how much water the company can pump. That’s because the unregulated wells were drilled before the local groundwater district was established in 2001 .

Local water supplies have been under pressure for decades as part of the explosive growth that has put Comal County at the top of lists of fastest-growing regions in the U.S. The boom in development has also led to investors buying up water rights and marketing them to developers in water deals that echo the oil and gas deals that have made many a Texas landowner rich.

Urbanczyk thought the Texas Water Supply wells would be a good bet to supply a 1,640-home subdivision he was planning on roughly 560 acres of his property, Honey Creek Ranch, just outside Bulverde. He and his wife, Terry, have lived there with their children since the late 1990s.

After a battle with neighbors , environmentalists, and cavers intent on protecting Honey Creek Cave and the pristine stream that pours out of the cave, Urbanczyk entertained an offer from the Nature Conservancy and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to buy his land and make it a park. TPWD commissioners approved the funding last month.

But TPWD won’t take the land if it comes with a requirement to buy a whole subdivision’s worth of water, as the contract stipulates.

“Please spread the word that Honey Creek will not become a park unless the … contract can be stopped,” Terry Urbanczyk wrote in an email to potential supporters obtained by the San Antonio Report. “We have tried every way possible to get them to back down or change the contract but they will not.”

Ronnie Urbanczyk declined to be interviewed for this story. Texas Water Supply President Kevin Meier declined to comment, but a legal filing in a court battle with the City of Bulverde over whether Texas Water Supply is adhering to Bulverde’s building ordinances might explain why the company has no interest in dropping the contract.

It has spent “thousands of hours of effort and tens of millions of private dollars” building a water pipeline from its Trinity Aquifer wells to Urbanczyk’s ranch along State Highway 46 in Comal County, the filing states.

Tapping Trinity Aquifer

Texas Water Supply’s business model is to profit off pumping the Trinity Aquifer, a water-bearing limestone rock layer that sweeps through northern Bexar and southern Comal counties. Texas Water Supply’s website says its wells give it access to enough water to supply 200,000 people.

The company has two fields of water wells, speckled across northern Bexar County next to tract housing, undeveloped lots of former ranchland, and alongside the Salado Creek trail. One set of wells lies south of the Army’s Camp Bullis, and another set is scattered on either side of U.S. Highway 281.

“The Texas Hill Country is one of the fastest-growing regions in the country, and we’re committed to sustainably supplying water for its population,” the company’s website states. “

Texas Water Supply’s largest customer is SAWS. The arrangement is a holdover from Bexar Met, a troubled water utility that SAWS absorbed nine years ago.

SAWS’ top officials often complain about Texas Water Supply’s unreliability, especially during droughts.

“It’s a very volatile supply that they produce,” said Donovan Burton, a SAWS vice president. “They produce a lot of times when it’s wet, but it’s not as productive in dry times.”

At full production, Texas Water Supply has said it can pump up to 32,000 acre-feet, or 10.4 billion gallons per year. Groundwater experts believe the Trinity Aquifer can’t sustain that amount of pumping.

It far exceeds the 24,856 acre-feet per year that the groundwater district, Trinity Glen Rose Groundwater Conservation District , has said can be pumped without causing unwanted drawdowns in neighboring wells. The district’s territory includes sections of the Trinity Aquifer in northern Bexar County and slivers of Comal and Kendall counties.

“The proposed additional withdrawal now makes it that much more difficult, if not almost impossible, to manage this resource effectively,” wrote George Wissmann, Trinity Glen Rose’s general manager, in a 2017 letter.

Company has ties to corrupt Bexar Met contract

Texas Water Supply is the latest incarnation of Water Exploration Co, a limited partnership formed in 1999 by Boerne water marketer and well driller Dean Davenport and unnamed investors. In the late 2000s, Davenport’s company often made the front page of the San Antonio Express-News because of a corruption scandal involving Bexar Metropolitan Water District.

The now-defunct utility that once covered swaths of Bexar County mostly outside Loop 410 awarded a $177 million contract to Water Exploration and waived its sovereign immunity, allowing the company to sue Bexar Met over disputes.

Days after the contract was awarded, Bexar Met’s former spokesman, T.J. Connolly, received $16,000 from Water Exploration. Connolly later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges after taking the money and using it to make campaign contributions to Bexar Met board members.

In 2012, when SAWS took over the struggling Bexar Met, it took over the Water Exploration contract, too. SAWS President and CEO Robert Puente said the utility had to take on all of Bexar Met’s assets and liabilities.

“There’s numerous, numerous contracts they had that we either had to just absorb, buy out, or renegotiate,” Puente said. “Some of them were good, but most of them were bad.”

In the case of Water Exploration Co., SAWS officials negotiated contract amendments that require the company to stop pumping when Trinity Aquifer levels drop to a certain threshold. That’s meant to protect nearby landowners and businesses, hundreds of whom rely on private Trinity Aquifer wells for drinking water.

Burton said SAWS negotiated a “floor” into the contract because “they have water quality issues below that level.”

“And then there’s impacts to all the regional neighbors,” Burton continued.

SAWS’ displeasure with Texas Water Supply also stems from the way the company operates its water wells.

“It could be a decent project if they would just run it in the right way and not try to do what they do, which is just trying to sell so much water and pump out so much water all at once,” Burton said.

The contract with SAWS ends in 2027; officials said they do not intend to extend it.

Texas Water Supply is born

The looming end of the SAWS contract could have spelled the end of profitable pumping from the Trinity wells for Water Exploration . Instead, in 2017, Brightstar Capital Partners announced it had chosen to partner with the newest incarnation of the company, Texas Water Supply, which included Davenport’s company and another controlled by Harold “Trip” duPerier III, a Boerne real estate agent who bills himself as “the Texas Landman.” Brightstar founder and managing partner Andrew Weinberg praised Texas Water Supply in a statement at the time, calling it “an excellent fit with our strategy of investing in closely held businesses where we can apply our capital, technical knowledge, and operating experience to drive growth and value-creation.” Meier, a Bandera real estate agent who worked with duPerier, replaced Bill Gehrmann as Texas Water Supply’s top official last July. The company now has multiple full-time employees and an office in Boerne.

DuPerier’s real estate website states, “We respect the land and the natural wonders of Texas” and that “the Texas Landman believes in long-term and sustainable services that produce enduring products.”

Ryan Bass, an environmental planner for the City of Boerne who hunts on a private ranch downstream of Urbanczyk’s property, thinks the broader effect of increased pumping from the Trinity Aquifer will be anything but sustainable. The groundwater Texas Water Supply is pumping from northern Bexar County and shipping to southern Comal County “will forever change the landscape,” he said in a Sept. 9 email.

“Not only will there be negative impacts from a natural resource management perspective, but with our state government code restricting a county’s ability to plan and manage growth, we will see overall negative impacts on quality of life and irreversible land use changes throughout this part of the Hill Country,” Bass wrote.

The company’s efforts to complete the pipeline from northern San Antonio to Urbanczyk’s ranch has stalled as it and a partner company await a ruling in a lawsuit with the City of Bulverde over whether the company’s construction work is violating Bulverde’s ordinances regulating tree-cutting.

Gaming eminent domain law

Texas Water Supply is building the pipeline through an agreement with South Comal Water Supply Corporation, a nonprofit formed in 2016.

For-profit water companies don’t have the authority of eminent domain, a power that governments typically exercise to acquire land from unwilling sellers. Under Texas law, however, nonprofit water supply corporations do.

“I think [Texas Water Supply] maybe figured out an end-around,” by partnering with Comal WSC, said Carly Barton, an attorney with Braun and Gresham, a Dripping Springs firm that often represents landowners fighting eminent domain lawsuits.

A legal filing from Texas Water Supply states the company has “entered into various agreements with South Comal WSC involving the production, transportation, and provision of wholesale water in northern Bexar, Comal, and Kendall counties and surrounding areas.”

Sure enough, landowners along the companies’ desired pipeline route have been are facing eminent domain threats from the nonprofit.

That includes Lynn Graham, whose former ranch land in northern San Antonio has been in her family for generations. The former cattle ranchers divided the property among their children, and Graham ended up with the roughly 37 acres where she and her husband live along Blanco Road.

In 2019, Graham first heard from surveyors representing South Comal WSC wanting to route the pipeline over her land. Threats of eminent domain soon followed.

Graham shared an email thread with the San Antonio Report that shows how in August, Graham’s lawyer was discussing the property acquisition in an email thread directly with Texas Water employees, including Meier and general manager Rex Walker.

“I have never physically met a South Comal Water Supply person,” Graham said. “Even the signature on the contract is just a line, and there’s no printed name.”

Deciding her chances were better outside of court than in, Graham agreed to sell an acre and a half of her land. She hasn’t gotten paid yet. She said she’d say no to the money if Texas Water Supply would let her out of the contract.

“The only reason the land got sold is because of [the threat of] eminent domain,” Graham said.

It’s not clear that South Comal WSC has actually exercised eminent domain by taking any landowners to court yet. As of 2020, no cases had been filed, according to the most recent annual report from the Texas Comptroller. A search of court records in Comal and Bexar counties also showed no results.

Nonprofit water supply corporations may have eminent domain authority, but they’re also typically bound by Texas open records laws. However, attempts by Barton to learn more about the connection between South Comal Water Supply and Texas Water Supply have been blocked by the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

On May 20, Barton filed a request seeking “documents and correspondence” regarding the two companies’ relationship and the pipeline route from Bexar County northward.

South Comal appealed the request to the Attorney General’s office. In an Aug. 2 opinion, Assistant Attorney General Emily Kunst sided with the pipeline company, blocking the release of the records.

Kunst agreed with the company’s assertion — while it may be a nonprofit water supply company that would fall under Texas open records law, it doesn’t have any customers yet.

“You explain the corporation was formed ‘to provide water service someday, [but] it does not actually do so currently nor has it constructed any pipeline to serve this purpose,’” Kust wrote, adding that the company also isn’t currently exempt from property taxes.

“We, therefore, conclude the corporation is not a governmental body under the [Public Information] Act at this time,” Kunst’s opinion states.

What bothers Graham most is that Texas law allows essentially allows a private corporation to force a private landowner to sell their property.

“I will do anything in that world somehow to hold them accountable for using a power of condemnation in a private setting,” Graham said. “I just am so pissed off about that.”

Correction: Due to an editing error, a previous version of this story included an incorrect affiliation for attorney Carly Barton.

More from San Antonio Report

Plans for terry black’s and parking garage near the pearl get ok from city design panel, nirenberg emerges as key voice on biden’s new immigration crackdown, after failed presidential bid, will hurd is still preaching bipartisanship, brendan gibbons.

Brendan Gibbons is a former senior reporter at the San Antonio Report. He is an environmental journalist for Oil & Gas Watch. More by Brendan Gibbons

Private equity firm invests in business that sells water in the Texas Hill Country

Posted by admin | Oct 12, 2017

Money is flowing into a local water business to make more drinking water available and plug projected shortages as the Texas Hill Country’s population swells.

A new company launched by a prominent rural Texas land broker in San Antonio,  Harold Trip DuPerier  III, secured significant capital from a New York City-based private equity investment firm, the companies announced.

Local water well operator Texas Water Supply Company LLC was formed in early October with its governing agent as DBT Investments LP, which was created by DuPerier in 1999, records show… More from BizJournals.com

Get Involved

Hill country alliance.

• Mission and Principles
• Texas Hill Country Conservation Network
• Board of Directors
• Testimonials
• Water Resources
• Land Stewardship
• Planning and Development
• Night Skies
• Legislature and Regulation
• Scenic Beauty

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog

Harold T. Duperier, III has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials

Texas Land for Sale (PTR)

Texas Ranches For Sale, Land for Sale in Texas, Hill Country Ranches for Sale, Texas Real Estate, Texas Land Sales

• Texas Land Man LLC

Trip duPerier, Texas Land Man LLC , specializes in selling Texas Hill Country property, Hill Country estates, and South Texas ranches. He sells 60-70 ranches every year and has for the last 20 years. The average price of these estate ranches ranges from $500,000 up to $10 million and more. Trip and his office staff will find you the ranch you need, even if it is not in their listings. Give them a call and they will help you find your dream ranch. Their office is located in the Cowboy Capital of the world, Bandera, Texas, but the real estate agent sales ranches found all over the state in addition to beautiful Bandera County .

The market is strong, so contact them below if you are serious about finding a ranch.

• 830-796-3018
• 830-796-4852 fax

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Hottest Skirt Styles to Rock in 2023

20 trendy sunglasses styles to elevate your summer fashion, plus size summer outfits – plus size summer outfits big stomach, incredible weight loss transformations: these people prove that losing weight can change your life.

10 Trendy Summer Outfits for Black Women to Slay In

Spring Nails: The Ultimate Guide to Have The Best Spring Nails

A fredericksburg couple sues a boerne realtor for fraud over the sale of their hill country farm.

A Fredericksburg couple sued a Boerne realtor for fraud over the sale of their Hill Country farm.

Bruce Williams and his wife, Linda Davis, allege that the broker made false allegations and failed to disclose material facts in last year’s sale of a nearly 2,700-acre White Cross Ranch in Kerr County to a brokerage partnership.

The couple are seeking more than $1 million in damages from real estate broker Harold “Trip” DuPerier III and his broker, duPerier Texas Land Man, and other entities. The lawsuit was originally filed in February in Kendall County, but was filed last month in San Antonio County Court.

The defendants denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit an “extortion attempt by an opportunistic pair of plaintiffs seeking in excess of $1 million more than the $7.25 million already paid from the sale of White Cross Ranch.”

In a statement, duPerier Texas Land Man said it had tried to resolve the dispute “amicably and without the cost of litigation, but to no avail.”

Related News

AncientFaces

• Surname Directory
• Dumusaj - Du-rall
• Duperier - Dupkoski
• Harold Duperier
• Harold T. Duperier Iii

Harold T. Duperier Iii c. 1963

Harold t duperier iii's history: circa 1963.

Uncover new discoveries and connections today by sharing about people & moments from yesterday. - Discover how AncientFaces works .

Living status

• Advertisement
• Did you know?
• share Memories below

Share what you remember. Ask what you wish to know. Connect to discover more.

Add Memories, Stories & Photos about Harold

Family, friend, or fan... share memories, stories, photos, or simply leave a comment to show you care. Remember the past to connect today & preserve for tomorrow.

Harold Duperier's Family Tree & Friends

Harold duperier's family tree, cheryl a. (mcalister) duperier, harold's friends, other harold duperier biographies, other duperier family biographies.

Fredericksburg couple sues realtor Boerne for fraud over sale of Hill Country Ranch

A Fredericksburg couple sued a Boerne realtor for fraud over the sale of their Hill Country ranch.

Bruce Williams and his wife, Linda Davis, allege the broker made misrepresentations and failed to disclose material facts during the sale last year of the approximately 2,700-acre White Cross Ranch in Kerr County to a partnership affiliated with the broker.

The couple are seeking more than $1 million in damages from real estate broker Harold “Trip” duPerier III, his brokerage, the duPerier Texas Land Man and other entities.

The defendants denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit “an attempted reshuffle by an opportunistic pair of plaintiffs who are asking for more than $1 million more than the $7.25 million they have already received from the sale of the White Cross Ranch”.

In a statement, the duPerier Texas Land Man said it had attempted to resolve the dispute “amicably and without court costs, but to no avail.”

“duPerier Texas Landman brokers and agents strive to be the best professionals in ranch sales,” he said Monday. “It’s a pity that the sellers are not satisfied with the results of their transaction.”

Williams and Davis in June 2020 signed a listing agreement with the duPerier Texas Land Man to sell the ranch. Of the society website says its “client list consists of movie stars, CEOs, music stars and other influential clients”.

On ExpressNews.com: Trophy animals abound in Texas, but hunters stay home

The couple put the ranch, which they bought in 2010, up for sale for $8 million. At least part of the ranch was used as hunting-ground for native wildlife and imported exotic animals.

New Mexico rancher Henry McDonald submitted an offer and, after some negotiation, agreed to buy White Cross Ranch for $7.25 million in late 2020.

In January 2021, Williams and Davis were notified that another buyer wanted to purchase the ranch for the same price.

According to the defendants’ response to the lawsuit, the purchase agreement “specifically named Henry McDonald and/or his assigns as the purchaser.” The defendants add that the sales contract did not contain any prohibition of assignment. Instead, the contract “explicitly provided” that McDonald’s could assign its rights under the contract to any party.

DTB Investments LP stepped in as buyer.

Williams and Davis “became curious” about DTB and conducted their own research, according to their lawsuit. They discovered that duPerier was the director of DTB. State records show that duPerier is the director of DTB’s general partner.

The defendants confirmed that duPerier had an interest in the partnership and that he was buying the ranch “for the benefit of his family,” the lawsuit says. “Although the plaintiffs were concerned that this information would not be disclosed, based on the defendants’ representations, they have decided to proceed with the closing as planned.”

The folder : Local crime and courtroom news, delivered weekly to your inbox

After the deal closed in February 2021, Williams and Davis said they learned DTB negotiated to buy the mission from McDonald’s for $571,500.

“Defendants have not disclosed that the actual purchase price for the property was $7,821,500” – the original purchase price plus the disposal price, the couple’s lawsuit says.

The representation that duPerier purchased the ranch for his family’s enjoyment was false, Williams and Davis’ complaint adds. They say the “intent was to use the property for development and sell it for a profit,” citing DTB’s March 2021 purchase of the 4,837-acre YO4 Ranch just north of the White Cross Ranch.

In August, DTB sold 1,000 acres of White Cross Ranch to RRCT Ltd. of Kerrville. The couple believe the land was sold at “a significantly higher price” than what DTB had bought from them six months earlier.

The following month, the lawsuit adds, DTB sold the approximately 1,700 remaining acres of White Cross Ranch and YO4 Ranch to Will-O Ranch LP – another partnership affiliated with duPerier.

SA inc. : Get the best business news straight to your inbox

Late last year, Will-O Ranch sold the 1,700 acres and approximately 857 acres of YO4 Ranch to Austin-based 4B Ranch Partners LLC. Again, Williams and Davis believe the land was sold at “a significantly higher price” than DTB bought it at earlier in the year.

“We have trusted and relied on the DuPerier entities as trustees,” Williams and Davis said in an emailed statement. “They owed us the highest duties known to the law. They have misled, distorted and failed to disclose information to us, their customers, for the sole purpose of lining their own pockets.

In addition to the fraud claim, Williams and Davis are suing duPerier, his company and partnerships, and one of his agents who handled the sale of White Cross Ranch for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and violations of law. on deceptive marketing practices.

The defendants say the lawsuit is “without merit”. They add in their response that the plaintiffs “were aware of – and agreed to – many of the actions they now complain about.”

The lawsuit was originally filed in February in Kendall County, but was returned to San Antonio District Court last month.

[email protected]

Privacy Policy Designed using Magazine Hoot . Powered by WordPress .

• SEC Standings
• Class Breakdown
• A&M Commits
• A&M Offers
• Out of State
• All Recruits
• Basketball Recruiting
• Women's Basketball
• Premium Feed
• Subscription Benefits
• Subscribe Now
• Advertise With Us
• TexAgs Radio
• Post of the Day
• 12th Man Foundation
• Help Center

Interesting ranch sale situation

phorizt said: ok these people bought a ranch in Kerr County in 2010 and sold it almost 11 years later and still lost almost $1mil(13% of the original purchase price) on the transaction? How is that even possible in the hill country?

SanAntoneAg said: From the San Antonio Express-News article: Note the second comma in the first sentence, which is missing from the linked article in the OP. The couple listed the ranch, which they bought in 2010, for $8 million. At least a portion of the ranch has been used as hunting grounds for native wildlife and imported exotic animals. Henry McDonald, a New Mexico ranch owner, submitted an offer and after some negotiating, agreed to buy White Cross Ranch for $7.25 million at the end of 2020. The article doesn't state the seller's original purchase price. Only the $8 million listed price and the more recent $7.25 million agreed purchase price. Probably behind a paywall. https://www.expressnews.com/business/local/article/Fredericksburg-couple-sue-Boerne-real-estate-17073065.php

RAB87 said: phorizt said: ok these people bought a ranch in Kerr County in 2010 and sold it almost 11 years later and still lost almost $1mil(13% of the original purchase price) on the transaction? How is that even possible in the hill country?

flashplayer said: That stinks to high heaven. They were dumb to not break it into smaller tracts and sell for higher prices though. So many people with lots of acreage are pretty nave when it comes time to sell.

HTownAg98 said: flashplayer said: That stinks to high heaven. They were dumb to not break it into smaller tracts and sell for higher prices though. So many people with lots of acreage are pretty nave when it comes time to sell.

Scott Sterlings Face said: Paragraph 8 of the Farm & Ranch contract says: "Texas law requires a real estate broker or sales agent who is a party to a transaction or acting on behalf of a spouse, parent, child, business entity in which the broker or sales agent owns more than 10%, or a trust for which the broker or sales agent acts as a trustee or of which the broker or sales agent or the broker or sales agent's spouse, parent or child is a beneficiary, to notify the other party in writing before entering into a contract of sale." Seems like there could be a case if it wasn't disclosed, but that is why we have contracts and things in writing.

Scott Sterlings Face said: I honestly didn't know he sold out. I wonder if he sold out completely or still retains a percentage? Really doesn't matter either way, he would still have to disclose that as the buyer he has a broker license in the state.

AgAE said: It's very difficult to be a broker and a land trader without getting a bad reputation as a broker.

HTownAg98 said: AgAE said: It's very difficult to be a broker and a land trader without getting a bad reputation as a broker.

• Terms & Privacy
• Mobile Site